Vehicle Carriers Class Action

Case Information

Did you purchase or lease a new vehicle in Canada that had been transported by vehicle carrier international shipping services, or did you purchase vehicle carrier international shipping services in Canada, between February 1, 1997 and December 31, 2012?  If so, your legal rights could be affected.

Class Actions are underway across Canada which allege overcharges for Roll On Roll Off ocean freight shipping of vehicles, bought or leased during that time.

Class action lawsuits have been brought across Canada against various international Roll On/Roll Off shipping companies.

Those lawsuits allege that people or companies in Canada who paid for international Vehicle Carrier Services, including as part of the cost of the purchase or lease of a new car, may have overpaid for the cost of those services between February 1, 1997 and December 1, 2012 (the “Class Period”).

“Vehicle Carrier Services” means paid international ocean shipping services via roll on/roll off vessels (“RoRo”) of cargo, such as new and used cars and trucks, as well as agricultural, construction and mining equipment (collectively “Vehicles”). A “RoRo” is a type of ocean vessel that allows wheeled Vehicles to be driven on and off the vessel and parked on its decks for ocean transport. It is alleged that among other things, customers were overcharged for Vehicle Carrier Services as the defendants participated in an unlawful conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, increase, or control the price for Vehicle Carrier Services. 
 

Current Status of the Class Actions:

New Settlement:

A third settlement has been reached in the Class Actions. The Settlement Agreement was reached with the defendants Höegh Autoliners AS and Höegh Autoliners Inc. (collectively, "Höegh"). Höegh has agreed to pay CAD $2,729,000 for the benefit of settlement class members and to provide co-operation to the Plaintiffs in pursuing their claims against the remaining non-settling defendants (the “Höegh Settlement Agreement”).

The Höegh Settlement Agreement requires court approval and is not an admission of liability, wrongdoing or fault by Höegh. The litigation will continue against the remaining non-settling defendants.

The motions to approve the Höegh Settlement Agreement are scheduled to be heard on:

At these hearings, the Courts will determine whether the settlement is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the Class Members. The lawyers for the Plaintiffs will also be requesting that legal fees of up to 30% of the settlement funds plus disbursements and applicable taxes be approved by the Courts and paid out of the settlement funds.

If the Höegh Settlement Agreement is approved by the Courts, the settlement funds, less court-approved fees, disbursements and applicable taxes will continue to be held in an interest-bearing trust account along with the funds from previous settlements. Settlement funds will not be distributed to Class Members at this time. The continuing litigation may or may not result in further settlements or judgments. If there is a further recovery, it will be added to the present monies and an efficient distribution will be made at an appropriate time. The Courts will approve when and to whom the settlement funds will be distributed.

Previous Settlements:

A settlement agreement was reached with the defendant Compania Sud Americana De Vapores S.A. ("CSAV") in July, 2016. Under the terms of it's settlement agreement, CSAV agreed to pay CAD $450,000 for the benefit of settlement class members and to provide co-operation to the Plaintiffs in pursuing their claims against the non-settling defendants. CSAV did not have any direct commerce to Canada of Vehicle Carrier Services during the relevant time period. The CSAV settlement has received the necessary court approvals.

A second settlement agreement was reached with the defendants Mitsui O.S.K., Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Bulk Shipping (U.S.A.), Inc., Nissan Motor Car Carrier Co. Ltd., and World Logistics Service (USA) Inc. (collectively, “MOL”) in September, 2022. Under the terms of it’s settlement agreement, MOL agreed to pay CAD $7,000,000 for the benefit of settlement class members and to provide cooperation to the Plaintiffs in pursuing their claims against the non-settling defendants. The MOL settlement has received the necessary court approvals.  

The settlement funds reached to date are being held in an interest-bearing trust account until a future date.

The settlements are not an admission of liability, wrongdoing or fault by CSAV or MOL, but a compromise of the disputed claims. The litigation is continuing against the remaining non-settling defendants.  

Certification/Authorization

On April 1, 2019, the Superior Court, before the Judicial District of Montréal, authorized the class action on behalf of the following group:

Any person who purchased in Québec vehicle carrier services (RoRo) or who purchased or leased in Québec a new motor vehicle, new farm machinery or new construction equipment that was transported by RoRo vessels between February 1, 1997, and December 31, 2012

To view a copy of the Québec authorization order click here.

On April 14, 2020, the British Columbia class action was certified on behalf of the following class:

All British Columbia resident persons who, during the Class Period of February 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012, purchased Vehicle Carrier Services from a Defendant, or purchased or leased a new Vehicle in British Columbia that had been transported using Vehicle Carrier Services provided by a Defendant. The definition of Vehicle includes automobiles, trucks and high and heavy equipment such as buses, trucks, and agricultural and construction vehicles.

To view a copy of the BC certification order click here.

Your Options:

To comment on the Höegh Settlement Agreement

  1. If you do not oppose the proposed Höegh Settlement Agreement, you do not need to appear at the hearings or take any other action at this time. 
  2. If you wish to comment on or object to the Höegh Settlement Agreement, you must deliver a written submission to the appropriate lawyer below by November 17, 2025. The lawyer will forward any submissions to the appropriate Court.

Foreman & Company

1-855-814-4575, ext. 106 

[email protected]

4 Covent Market Place

Attention: Kassandra Gauld

London, Ontario N6A 1E2

Belleau Lapointe s.e.n.c.r.l.

1-888-987-6701

[email protected]

300 Place d'Youville, office B-10

Attention: Alexandrine Comtois

Montréal, Québec H2Y 2B6

CFM Lawyers LLP

1-800-689-2322

[email protected]

Suite 400, 856 Homer Street

Attention: Betty Lee

Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 2W5

Opt-out of the proceeding

The Court ordered deadline to opt-out (exclude yourself) from the Class Action was May 10, 2017. If you are a class member and did not previously opt-out, you are legally bound by the results of the Class Actions, including the Höegh Settlement Agreement if it is approved.

Important Dates:

Objection or Comment Deadline to the Höegh Settlement Agreement November 17, 2025
Ontario Höegh Settlement Approval Hearing November 19, 2025
Québec Höegh Settlement Approval Hearing December 15, 2025
British Columbia Höegh Settlement Approval Hearing February 5, 2026